(Hui Yin has always been the reader in the family. She never leaves home without a book or two. And sometimes, she reads two books simultaneously!
And she is nuts about historical romances.)
Sure, I spent a fair amount of time reading Mills & Boon stuff during my teens. But I outgrew those (she is still at it, though) and went on to more "serious" and "intelligent" stuff - non-fictions like biographies, real-life crime stories as well as murder mysteries and sci-fi fantasies. And I absolutely had no interest in reading any historical romance novels, until about 2 years ago.
And I've been hooked since. Most of the stories are silly to begin with - titled, dashing and wickedly handsome aristocrats who would move mountains and swim the seven seas to be with their lovely (and often in distress) damsels. There would be conflicts, scandals and even tragedies before they could find true love with each other. And of course, the besotted lovers would live happily ever after.
Predictable? Absolutely. Waste of time? Not entirely.
You see, the words are usually written so beautifully. Even when the characters quarrel, they do so with so much finesse and grace. Check this out:
"If your carriage had been moving at any speed above an almost imperceptible crawl, madam, it would not have posed a reckless endangerment to serious, responsible travellers who would really prefer to get somewhere by the end of a day instead of spending eternity on one stretch of road." - Lucius Marshall, Viscount Sinclair in Simply Unforgettable
Or this:
"A woman can use charms and looks for three things. She can go into the theatre, she can become a man's mistress or she can marry. As for me, I have no inclination or talent for acting and no wish to shame my family by entering into an illicit relationship. My only choice is marriage. That, I suppose, is what it means for a woman to be a survivor." - Elizabeth Hotchkiss in How To Marry A Marquis
Classy, no? I absolutely adore this kind of language (of course the book titles are often really no brainers). Which explains why I'm so besotted with Hugh Jackman's Leopold in Kate & Leopold! Leopold talks like that - and he's tall, dark and handsome! Ha ha.
Well, there's nothing wrong with indulging in a little fantasy, as silly as it sounds. After all, grown men the world over are obsessed with their comics. At least I don't need to look at pages of drawings to read my books. That's for kids, isn't it?
7 comments:
Already had this argument with another pretentious, snob who berated me fer reading comics at me age.Just no idea what she was talking about - fooking brainless cow!
How dare you make fun of comics!?! Imagine a world without the works of Frank Miller (300, Sin City) or early 60s/70s Mad!?! And, eh, didn't yer Hugh Jacko play a certain Wolverine . . . Tsk, tsk.
I read reams and reams of blogs... they're mostly fantasy fiction and some are really quite entertaining!
:P
Ahlo, anfield nut, my hugh jacko plays wolverine in the movie version, not in the marvel comics. at least his suit looks more classy on the big screen than the hideous yellow spandex thing in the comics! though the hair - no redemption there. like i said, no pix needed to understand my books!
eh, you've read MBalogh's latest? Simply Magic....or something like that. It's hardcover, paperback to be out next year. I haven't read it myself though, but I have a feeling her last book in the "Simply" series be the best of the lot. It's Miss Claudia's story mah. Go read Simply Love, it's goooood! The Bedwyns very nearly stole the show.
If comics were such a dumbing down of the senses, why would Neil Gammon be so attracted to the medium?
Yo, Mr Solomon, where are you? Need some back up here against these philistine Hakka muis!
ooops, sorry, in me irritated state I missplelt Gaiman . . .
hakka muis rule here! hahaha. have to find the other simply books later. hopefully the library will have them.
Post a Comment